Thursday, May 13, 2021

Metropolitan Governance

Metropolitan governance can be defined as a set of institutions, rules, and actions that delineate policies and conditions for the life and economy of a metropolitan region (region interrelated with a city, networks of cities or conurbated areas or areas with continuous high densities all across the territory) (GIZ 2015:11).

https://indoleads.com/top-affiliate-programs-and-commissions-in-philippines-for-affiliate-marketers/

                                 

Metropolitan governance addresses the problem on fragmentation, inequity, spillovers, and dysfunctional governance system (GIZ 2015: 15). Through an effective metropolitan governance, development areas that transcends territorial boundaries like development planning, transport and traffic management, solid waste disposal and management, flood control and sewerage management, urban renewal, zoning and land use planning and shelter services, health and sanitation, urban protection and pollution controls and public safety (Mercado and Manasan:13) can be given attention thru cooperative undertaking and sharing of resources.


An effective urban metropolitan governance can only be achieved if it operates within the applicable ideal institutional arrangement and adheres to the good urban governance norms of “subsidiarity, equity, efficiency, civic engagement, transparency and accountability” (UN Habitat 2007:6)

Types of Metropolitan Institutional Arrangements:

1. Fragmented Governance – with some Inter-Municipal Coordination (horizontal cooperation among the local governments) 

    • Ad hoc cooperation among local governments / Case-by-case joint initiatives 

    •Committees, commissions, partnership agreements, consortium agreements, etc. 

    • Contracting among local governments 


2. Metropolitan / Regional Authority 

    • Regional authorities (metropolitan council, regional planning authority, service delivery              authority, or regional planning & service delivery authority) 


3. Metropolitan or Regional Government 

    • Metropolitan-level local government 

    • Regional government established by the national government 


4. Consolidated Local Government 

    • Territorial annexation or amalgamation


Some politico-administrative problems/issues encountered by metropolitan governments:

1. Laws / regulations discouraging, limiting, or prohibiting MG arrangements

2. Discouraging higher level government (e.g. due to different agendas)

3. Parochialism and governance fragmentation (lack of local support)

4. Reluctance of richest local governments and their constituencies to engage and share, sub-delegate decisions/ powers to metropolitan arrangements

5. Uncertainty about “who is responsible for what”; overlapping expenditure responsibilities

6. Limited institutional, administrative and/ or financial capacity at local level (GIZ:22)

7. Lack of authority, lack of commitment among the local governments in the area, and lack of financial sources are common pitfalls.

8. The need of metropolitan governance body to earn the command and respect from the local governments it is intended to coordinate.

9. Metropolitan areas with one dominating, core local government, present an additional challenge, to find a way to motivate both large and small local governments for joint, coordinated efforts - in other words, to find “win-win” situations. (GIZ;30)


To address these, the following have to considered:


1. Establish appropriate metropolitan governance structure based on the national and local context (the legal framework, local government responsibilities, the particular issues and opportunities for the area, institutional capacity and tradition, etc.).


2. Weigh in the (a) potentials for economies of scale and service efficiency as well as the need to address spill-overs and regional disparities; versus (b) the impact on the access of citizens to their local government as well as their respective responsiveness and accountability.


3. Demand or encourage cooperation among local governments through the regional or national government, through intergovernmental systems, legal frameworks, or specific financial incentives (GIZ;10)


References


Anderson, Mats. Metropolitan Regions as Governance Systems: Unpacking Metropolitan Governance for Sustainable Development. Discussion Paper. GIZ and UN Habitat. August 2015

Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. Volume 2-Urban Situation Analysis. UN Habitat 2007

Metropolitan Regions as Governance Systems: Unpacking Metropolitan Governance for Sustainable Development. Discussion Paper. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. GIZ 2015.

Mercado, Ruben G. and Manasan Rosario G. Metropolitan Arrangements in the Philippines: Passing Fancy or the Future Megatrend?: An Inquiry Into the Evolution and Dynamics of Metropolitan Arrangements in the Philippines Under a Decentralized Regime.

The Metropolitan Century: Understanding Urbanisation and its Consequences OECD (2015), OECD Publishing, Paris as cited at Metropolitan Regions as Governance System. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. Discussion Paper. GIZ. August 2015


Monday, May 10, 2021

The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management

The Covid19 pandemic has changed the way people behave and interact consequently resulting to various social and environmental changes as well.

In a study recently conducted by AyyoobSharifiabc and Amir RezaKhavarian-Garmsird published at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720359209#s0095 , the following are the major issues revealed by the pandemics and recommendations for post-COVID planning.

 

Major Issues Revealed by the Pandemic

Major Recommendations/Implications for Post-COVID Planning

Environmental Quality (Air quality)

-Traffic emissions are major sources of pollution in many cities
- Non-traffic sources of pollution are also important in some contexts
- In some contexts, COVID-19 transmission/mortality rates are strongly associated with high levels of air pollution
- Long-term exposure to air pollution can increase human vulnerability to pandemics

- Greening the transportation and industry sectors can provide major air quality benefits
- Measures to reduce traffic-related pollution are not enough to address air quality in all contexts
- As measures designed for reducing some pollutants may increase secondary pollutants, holistic approaches to pollution mitigation are needed
- Reducing air pollution can contribute to reducing transmission/mortality rates of pandemics

Environmental Factors

- Evidence on the association between temperature and COVID-19 transmission rate are inconclusive
- When the wind speed is low, air pollution is likely to intensify transmission rate

- During pandemics, social distancing and other protection measures should continuously be promoted irrespective of environmental conditions
- Improving air quality can contribute to addressing issues related to covid-19 and other pandemics both in short and long term

Urban Water Cycle

- Unregulated human activities have resulted in the contamination of water resources in many cities
- Drugs used for treatment of COVID-19 patients may pollute freshwater resources
- Lack of sewage treatment facilities in poor areas undermines the effectiveness of lockdown measures

- Designing regulations to minimize negative agricultural, industrial, and traffic impacts on water resources should be prioritized
- Sufficient disinfection of water plants and wastewater treatment plants and measures such as the prevention of sewage leakage into freshwater resources are essential to reduce human exposure to the virus

Socio-economic impacts (Social impacts)

- COVID-19 has exposed old problems and inequalities in a new light
- Inequalities make containment challenging, and may also lead to further diffusion of the virus
- Enforcing social distancing and other response measures is challenging in slums

- More inclusive actions towards reducing inequalities and addressing the needs of vulnerable groups should be prioritized
- Slum upgrading should be prioritized
- Social distancing policies should be coupled with economic support mechanisms
- Enhancing sense of community is critical for improving response and recovery capacities

Economic Impacts

-Homogeneous economic structure increases vulnerability
- Marginalized groups are disproportionately affected by the economic impacts of the pandemic
- Global supply chain makes cities vulnerable to disruptive events

- Diversifying urban economic structure is essential
- Developing relief programs to support vulnerable and marginalized groups is necessary during pandemics
- Transformation to more local supply chain that increases self-sufficiency is needed for dealing with the economic fallouts of the pandemic and similar future events

Management and Governance (Governance)

- Absence of proactive planning and emergency plans is a major reason for failure to respond effectively is some countries
- Fragmented urban governance erodes response and adaptation capacities

- Long-term visioning and integrated urban governance enhance adaptive capacity
- During pandemics, local governments should provide economic and social support to vulnerable groups
- In addition to top-down initiatives, certain levels of local leadership and community engagement are critical for timely response to pandemics

Smart Cities

- Smart solutions have contributed to developing more effective and efficient response and recovery measures (e.g., identifying and isolating infected individuals, reducing human-to-human contacts in service delivery, etc.)
- Techno-driven approaches have been successful in containing the virus, but have raised concerns regarding privacy protection and transparency

- Public access to real time and geo-referenced data enables better response and recovery from adverse events
- Techno-driven approaches should not undermine privacy issues and be misused to reinforce power relations
- Human-driven approaches are more suitable for citizen empowerment
- Combined approaches are better suited for containing the pandemic, dealing with privacy concerns, facilitating coordination and information sharing, and controlling the spread of misinformation

Transportation and Urban Design (Transportation)

- Increased transport connectivity is a risk factor that may contribute to the diffusion of infection diseases
- Public transportation may increase the risk of transmission during pandemics
- The pandemic may increase negative attitudes towards public transportation

- Smart mobility restrictions, based on the transmission risk of different transportation modes, is essential for containing the spread of the virus
- More attention to minimizing potential public health risks of public transportation is needed
- Modal shift to cycling and walking offers a unique opportunity to further promote active transportation

Transportation and Urban Design  (Urban design)

- Density alone is not a key risk factor contributing to the spread of the virus
- Some cities lack appropriate levels of green and open spaces to meet outdoor exercise and recreation demands of their citizens while fulfilling social distancing requirements

- Density alone is not a key risk factor contributing to the spread of the virus
- Some cities lack appropriate levels of green and open spaces to meet outdoor exercise and recreation demands of their citizens while fulfilling social distancing requirements

 

 

 

Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720359209#s0095

 


Saturday, May 8, 2021

INCLUSIVE CITY CONCEPT AS IMPLEMENTED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN THE PHILIPPINES (A Paper by Rodel C. Cuyco)

 

An inclusive city is  one that adheres to the “principle of growth with equity (UN-Habitat).” At the core of an inclusive city is people empowerment which means all “regardless of their economic means, gender, race, ethnicity, or religion” are actively engaged in the creation and enjoyment of “social, economic, and political opportunities (UN-Habitat)” in the city. It is founded on the principle that it is through an empowered citizenry that a “safe, livable environment with affordable and equitable access to urban services, social services, and livelihood opportunities (ADB; p.4)” can be sustainably established.

 

In the Philippines as presented in its New Urban Agenda, an inclusive city means “it is equitable, participatory, and provides universal access to quality basic services. It safeguards children, women, the elderly people, and persons with disability. It equalizes access to livelihood opportunities. And last but not least, it facilitates the transformation of informal settler families in the metropolises, enabling them to live their lives with more pride and dignity (https://hudcc.gov.ph).” It is also characterized as “better, greener and smarter.” “Better Cities are globally competitive, economically vibrant, and livable. Greener Cities are environmentally sustainable, climate resilient, and safe. Smarter Cities are connected, physically, spatially and digitally” (https://hudcc.gov.ph).

Pillars of an Inclusive City

According to the World Bank, the pillars of an inclusive city are spatial, social and economic inclusions. Spatial inclusion means providing affordable necessities such as housing, water and sanitation. (https://www.worldbank.org). Social inclusion means “guaranteeing equal rights and participation of all, including the most marginalized” (https://www.worldbank.org). And, economic inclusion which means creating jobs and giving urban residents the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of economic growth” (https://www.worldbank.org).

 

Factors

These pillars are given flesh and blood through policies and programs that consider the following factors: accessibility, affordability, resilience, and sustainability (ADB:p3). Accessibility which is the presence of “opportunities for safe, secure housing and reliable basic services for all individuals and communities” and “enabling these opportunities within social structures and cultural norms that may constrain individual or collective access to a service (ADB:p3).” Affordability in terms of “shelter, services, and transport solutions” both of individual families as well as the “capacity local and national governments” to deliver the same (ADB:p3). Resilience which is “the ability to resist, absorb, recover from, and reorganize in response to natural hazards without jeopardizing sustained socioeconomic advancement and development (ADB:p3).” Sustainability which is the capacity of the responsible entity, be it a family or a local or national government, to service debt, operate, maintain, renew, and/or expand its shelter or service delivery system and pro-poor infrastructure. Sustainability also calls for access to the technical, financial, and human support required for shelter and service delivery through ongoing systems and programs (ADB:p4).”

 

Mechanisms

 

An inclusive city is built on the following mechanisms: (i) joint strategic visions of all stakeholders through a participatory planning and decision-making process incorporating universal design, integrated urban planning, transparent accountability mechanisms, and the use of the city’s inherent assets; (ii) knowledge and information sharing; (iii) public participation and contribution; (iv) cross-subsidies, social protection, and gender balance, to ensure an adequate standard of living to the most economically disadvantaged and vulnerable population; (v) geographical and social mobility; (vi) business environment and pro-poor financing services that attract capital investment and allow everybody the possibility to undertake economic activities; (vii) resilience to global environmental and socioeconomic shocks an threats; and (viii) mechanisms to ensure the sustainable use of its resources (ADB:p4).

 

Government Policies and Laws that Support Inclusive Urban Development

 

1.   Adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals, specifically, Goal 11 which states “make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable” (https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11) and mainstreaming this to the Philippine Development Plan (PDP);

2.   Adoption of the UN Habitat III’s New Urban Agenda leading to the formulation of the Philippines New Urban Agenda with its goals for a Better, Greener, Smarter Cities in an Inclusive Philippines (https://hudcc.gov.ph) and the National Urban Development and Housing Framework;

3.   Ambisyon Natin 2040 which is the overall vision of the country and its people and being carried out thru the Philippine Development Plan. In a nutshell, Ambisyon Natin 2040 envision for Filipinos to “enjoy a strongly rooted, comfortable, and secure life” (http://2040.neda.gov.ph).

4.   Social inclusion programs like the Conditional Cash Transfer Program (CCT) or the Pantawid Pamilya Pilipino Program, Universal Health Care Program, Free Tertiary Education Act, Enhanced Basic Education Act, K-12 Act, and Alternative Learning System (https://hudcc.gov.ph).

5.   Climate Change Act of 2009 (Republic Act No. 9729 of 2009) and the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010 (RA 10121) which mandate for the mainstreaming of climate change action (CCA) and disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) in local development and comprehensive land use planning (https://hudcc.gov.ph).

6.   Urban Development and Housing Act (UDHA) of 1992 or RA 7279 which empowered the local government units (LGUs) to address urban development issues, paved the way for participatory governance, and ensured private sector participation in the national shelter program through a mandatory requirement to set aside 20% of all proposed subdivision areas for socialized housing (NUA:p.56)

7.   Passage of the 1991 Local Government Code (LGC) 1991 which mandates  the preparation of a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) and a Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) by local governments (https://hudcc.gov.ph).

To improve urban governance in their localities, Local Government Units have been implementing the following:

1.   Localization of Sustainable Development Goals, Ambisyon Natin 2040, Philippine Development Plan by mainstreaming these to major and term-based local development plan like the Comprehensive Development Plan and Comprehensive Land Use Plan and most especially to the Annual Investment Program which is the basis in the formulation of the LGU’s Annual Budget (DILG Memo);

2.   Subjecting the LGU to governance measures like the Local Government Performance Management System (LGPMS), Public Financial Management System (PFMS) and the Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG). These measures the effectiveness and efficiency of local governance and promote transparency, accountability, financial management, disaster preparedness, social protection, business friendliness, peace and order, and environmental management (https://hudcc.gov.ph).

3.   Road clearing operations to maintain public open spaces (https://www.dilg.gov.ph);

4.   Establishment of transparency and accountability measures which include the implementation of an effective Public Financial Management System, posting of financial records at the DILG’s Full Disclosure Portal and LGUs Bulletin Boards, implement Anti-Red Tape Act, No-Noontime Break Policy, and Freedom of Information Policy.

5.   Institutionalization of participatory mechanisms as all Local Special Bodies are mandated to have representatives from Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) coming from the basic sectors like women, youth, farmers, fisherfolks, senior citizens, etc. Barangays are mandated to conduct barangay assemblies twice a year (LGC).

 

Conclusion

 

          The creation of an inclusive city is a manifestation of a well-managed urban development. It is holistic and balanced in the sense that all areas of development are being harmonized including the social, economic and spatial (or land use) thru an empowered citizenry coming from all social strata as the driving force. It is the ideal goal of every local government.

 

          In the Philippines, all plans, policies and programs towards the achievement of creating inclusive cities are in place. It adopted the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 and UN Habitat III’s New Urban Agenda as expressed in Ambisyon 2040, Philippine Development Plan, Philippine New Urban Agenda, National Urban and Housing Development Framework. These plans are then being mainstreamed and localized thru the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Comprehensive Development Plans and other term-based plans of the local governments.

 

          In terms of laws, the Philippines has passed Climate Change Act of 2009 (RA 9729) and the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010 (RA 10121) and other environmental laws to ensure city’s resilience. It also has enacted Urban Development and Housing Act (UDHA) of 1992 (RA 7279) and the Local Government Code of 1991 (RA 7160) to empower local governments thru a system of decentralization as they address the challenges and demands of urbanization.

 

          The government has also installed good governance mechanisms to ensure transparency, accountability and participation like the Seal of Goof Local Governance, Anti-Red Tape, Full Disclosure Policy, among others.

 

           The Philippines seems to have an ideal enabling framework for creating inclusive cities, making it happen is the real big challenge. Prioritization of this framework and having competent implementors can spell the big difference.

         

         

References

 

Ambisyon Natin 2040. National Economic Development Authority accessed at http://2040.neda.gov.ph/about-ambisyon-natin-2040/

 

DILG Memorandum Circular (MC) No. 2020-145 accessed at https://www.dilg.gov.ph/issuances/mc/Continuation-of-Road-Clearing-/3286

 

https://dilg.gov.ph/PDF_File/issuances/memo_circulars/dilg-memocircular-2019515_b8b6e90fef.pdf

 

Enabling Inclusive Cities. Tool Kit for Inclusive Urban Development. Asian Development Bank. 2017

 

Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. IS Global  accessed at https://www.isglobal.org /en/-/sdg-11-make-cities-and-human-settlements-inclusive-safe-resilient-and sustainable#:~:text=Making%20cities%20safe%20and%20sustainable,a%20participatory%20and%20inclusive%20manner.

 

Habitat III: The Philippine National Report. HUDCC accessed at https://hudcc.gov.ph/HABITAT_III#:~:text=The%20theme%20of%20the%20New,%2C%20economically%20vibrant%2C%20and%20livable.

Inclusive Cities accessed at https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/inclusive-cities#1

 

National Urban Assessment: Republic of the Philippines. Asian Development Bank. 2014 accessed at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/42817/philippines-national-urban-assessment.pdf

 

SDG Goal 11. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development accessed at https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11

 

The New Urban Agenda accessed at https://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/

 

 

 

 

Norms of Good Urban Governance

 The norms of good urban governance as advocated by UN-HABITAT include sustainability, subsidiarity, equity, efficiency, transparency and accountability, civic engagement and citizenship, and security (UN-HABITAT, 2000). There is a strong linkage between good governance norms and the urban strategic planning process). Improvement in urban governance and planning practice are interdependent and mutually reinforcing

 

Sustainability

 

Sustainability involves ensuring that allocation and use of land and other resources is based on balanced social, economic and environmental priorities, with the aim of balancing the needs of present and future generations. Sustainability can be achieved by using the forum of urban consultations as a vehicle to a broad-based discussion on the future of the city, including potential impact of alternative development strategies on the community’s life, social and economic conditions, and the natural and built environment.

 

The urban strategic planning process provides that leaders and stakeholders representing all sections of urban society work together for a long-term, strategic vision and develop the ability to reconcile divergent interests for the common good. Thus, sustainability can be ensured through informed, collective decision-making and broad-based ownership of final solutions.

 

Subsidiarity

 

The principle of subsidiarity means that the responsibility for the provision and management of any service must be vested in the lowest level of authority that is best positioned to deliverthese services in an efficient and cost-effective manner. This implies that as the level of governance closest to the people, municipalities should be empowered as much as possible to develop and implement strategic and spatial plans. Such empowerment (or even ‘enablement’) would necessarily include delegation of power and resources to municipalities, accompanied by efforts to build their capacity to engage stakeholders in a meaningful, constructive decision-making process.

 

The strategic planning approach encourages and supports local governments to develop and implement urban development plans in consultation with stakeholders. The approach especially emphasizes the preparation of realistic action plans to address immediate priorities, which can be implemented in partnership with stakeholders.

 

Equity

 

Equity entails establishment of equitable principles for allocation of land, development of infrastructure, pricing for services and participation in setting priorities. Establishing investment incentives for targeted sectors and geographic areas is another aspect of equitable development.

 

The Urban Strategic Planning process underscores the importance of involving representatives of all stakeholder groups through a clear identification of different groups of stakeholders and their needs, including collection of gender-disaggregated data as far as possible. The consultation phase provides for participation of all stakeholders in a broad-based urban consultation event to determine the city’s development priorities. Ensuring that all stakeholders – men and women, vulnerable groups - have access to decision-making processes is the key to equitable development.

 

Gender equality is a central aspect in the principle of equity in good governance. This principle is recognized as being essential in the development of sustainable human settlements. Equality between men and women in governance refers to issues such as the equality of women in the family; women’s equal participation in public life; women’s equal access to resources, including land and property; women’s equal access to information, education and training as well as decision-making.

 

Efficiency

 

Efficiency implies that cities must be financially sound and cost-effective in their management of revenues and expenditures, the administration and delivery of services, and that all development decisions must ensure the most efficient use of resources. The promotion of inter-sectoral planning both at the local and central level is another aspect of efficiency.

 

The urban strategic planning process aims at maximising the existing human, physical and financial resources available in the city for urban development, by mobilising and engaging various stakeholder groups through innovative mechanisms and public-private partnerships. Through the involvement of the private sector and communities in setting priorities, cities can make better judgements regarding the prospective commitments of these partners in the implementation of development projects.

 

Transparency and Accountability

 

Transparency in decision-making and accountability of local authorities to their citizens are fundamental principles of good governance. Transparency and accountability are essential to build stakeholder understanding of local government. Access to information is the key to ensuring transparency and accountability. Laws and public policies should be applied in a transparent, predictable and even-handed manner. Public feedback systems such as report cards, hotlines and ombudsman should be established. Elected and appointed officials and civil servants need to set an example of high standards of professional and personal integrity.

 

 

In the context of urban strategic planning, transparency and accountability can be achieved through the active involvement of stakeholders in setting priorities and making decisions on how public resources will be spent. Transparent tendering and procurement procedures must be adopted for the implementation of action plans and projects. Involvement of stakeholders in priority-setting and preparation of action plans must be reinforced by facilitating greater access to information, including statistics and municipal financial data. These systems should be designed in such a way that they are equally accessible to all segments of the population, including being equally available to men and women.

 

Civic Engagement and Citizenship

 

Civic Engagement and citizenship is key aspect of good urban governance. People are the principal wealth of cities; they are both the object and the means of sustainable human development. Civic engagement implies that living together is not a passive exercise: in cities, people must actively contribute to the common good. Citizens, especially women, must be empowered to participate effectively in decision-making processes. The civic capital of the poor must be recognized and supported. Participation of civil society must be enabled through appropriate legal instruments and provisions. Participation must extend to not only decision-making about also making capital investments.

 

Engagement of stakeholders for taking development decisions is crucial for the successful implementation of any development plans. Involvement of men and women equally in positions of decision-making is central for engagement of citizens in the governance process. This could be done through mechanisms such as city consultations, citizen’s forums and issue-specific working groups. Civic engagement also refers to proper and regular payment for services, care of existing and newly developed infrastructure and the establishment of community support groups or community-based organizations to resolve issues directly affecting specific areas.

 

Security

 

Security as a principle of good urban governance applies to individuals and their living environment. Every individual has the inalienable right to life, liberty and the security of person. Cities must strive to avoid human conflicts and natural disasters by involving all stakeholders in crime and conflict prevention and disaster preparedness. The notion of security also implies security of tenure, and freedom from persecution and forced evictions. Through the involvement in the urban strategic planning, citizens can raise issues pertaining to their own sense of security, in relation to person and property. Security of women and children, ethnic and religious minorities must be addressed in a way that satisfies their specific needs.

 

Promoting security of tenure through increased access to housing for the most vulnerable groups is one of the key objectives of urban strategic planning. Adopting suitable methodologies for environmental planning and management and formulating disaster-preparedness strategies and emergency management at the central and local levels are also important aspects of security.

 

 

Source: Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. Volume 1. UN Habitat. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. December 2007

 

A New Role for Planners

A planner is:

An Enabler. Planners perform a positive role, as they enable development to proceed and allow developers, environmentalists, the public, and others involved in the future of towns and cities a

voice and stake in sustainable development issues.

A Facilitator. A planner undertakes an essential role in facilitating development and environmental protection as well as facilitates an on-going process of discussion and negotiation with and between a range of actors and institutions that shape the future of urban areas.

A Choreographer. A planner plays a pivotal mediation role between different interest groups and vested interests in the city, and choreographs the various pressures and conflicts of interests that typically come to the fore in discussions over the future of cities.

A Strategist. A planner manages a complex political and policy-making process in urban areas that requires long- and medium term planning and attendant strategic thinking across short-term needs and conflicts.

An Adviser. A planner is expected to advise his or her employer, and other actors and institutions in an urban area, imparting professional opinion based on the development of unique knowledge and skills, and to do so in an impartial way.

An Educator. A planner works in an environment where his or her decisions, or those of others in the urban area with a responsibility for the future of cities, need to be disseminated among professionals and the public at large, and where decisions, choices and the rationale behind them are adequately explained

 

Source: Jones (2002). Suggestions for ‘Value-Added by The Professional Planner, UCL.


Saturday, April 10, 2021

The Ultimate List of Eco-Friendly & Environmental Holidays [A Guide to Green Holidays]


1. Green New Year's Resolution - January 1

2. National Electricity Day - January 9

3. International Zebra Day - January 31

February

4. World Wetlands Day - February 2

5. World Bonobo Day - February 14

6. World Hippopotamus Day - February 15

7. International Polar Bear Day - February 27

March

8. World Wildlife Day - March 3

9. International Day of Action for Rivers - March 14

10. World Consumer Rights Day - March 15

11. Global Recycling Day - March 18

12. World Sparrow Day - March 20

13. International Day of Forests - March 21

14. World Water Day - March 22

15. World Meteorological Day - March 23

16. Earth Hour - Last Saturday of March

April

17. World Aquatic Animal Day - April 3

18. National Park Week - April 19th-27th

19. Dark Sky Week - April 20th-26th

20. Earth Day - April 22

21. National Arbor Day - April's last Friday

May

22. Green Up Day in Vermont - May's first Saturday

23. International Migratory Bird Day in the U.S. and Canada - May's second Saturday

24. Bike-to-Work Day - May's third Friday

25. Greenery Day in Japan - May 4

26. World Bee Day - May 20

27. International Day for Biological Diversity- May 22

28. European Day of Parks - May 24

29. World No Tobacco Day - May 31

June

30. National Trails Day - June's first Saturday

31. World Environment Day - June 5

32. World Oceans Day - June 8

33. Coral Triangle Day - June 9

34. Global Wind Day - June 15

35. World Day to Combat Desertification and Drought - June 17

36. World Rainforest Day - June 22

July

37. National Clean Beaches Week - July 1st-7th

38. World Population Day - July 11

39. World Nature Conservation Day - July 28

40. International Tiger Day - July 29

August

41. Mountain Day - August 11

42. World Elephant Day - August 12

43. National Honey Bee Day - August 21

September

44. National Wildlife Day - September 4

45. International Day of Clean Air - September 7

46. International Day for the Preservation of the Ozone Layer - September 16

47. National Cleanup Day - September 19

48. Clean Up the World Weekend - September's third weekend

49. Zero Emissions Day - September 21

50. European Mobility Week - September 16th-22nd

51. World Car Free Day - September 22

52. National Public Lands Day - September 26

53. National Crush Day - September 27

54. World Rivers Day - September's last Sunday

October

55. World Habitat Day - October's first Monday

56. World Vegetarian Day - October 1

57. World Animal Day - October 4

58. International ShakeOut Day - October's Third Thursday

59. World Planting Day - October 22

60. International Day of Climate Action - October 24

November

61. World Vegan Day - November 1

62. International Day for Preventing the Exploitation of the Environment in War and Armed Conflict - November 6

63. National Recycling Day - November 15

64. National Hiking Day - November 17

December

65. World Soil Day - December 5

66. International Mountain Day - December 11 


Source:

https://www.ecoenclose.com/blog/the-ultimate-list-of-ecofriendly-environmental-holidays-a-guide-to-green-holidays/


<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-4267074632853356"

     crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

  I attended the Intensive Course in Environmental Planning (ICEP) last February 12-16, 2024 conducted by the Planning and Research Foundati...